I read a post by one Wangjangnim at KoreaBridge and raced off a quick comment. Briefly, Wangjangnim appears to be a hagwon owner and his post attacked teachers for two things – claiming to be skilled, to be the Best Teacher and for making and using tests that aren’t appropriate.
How do teachers measure their effectiveness, and here you will slowly realize why I am against how they do it. Scores. Teachers effectiveness are measured by the students scores, but there is a problem. These tests are created by the teacher. The lesson are prepped by same teacher. The lessons are given by same teacher. The test is given by same teacher. The test is corrected by same teacher. Anyone with half a brain immediately understands the problem. Anyone with a smidgen of understanding of HR practices and ethics revolving around test taking knows that this is simply ineffective.
Tests cannot be objective under those circumstances. OOOO you say, but that is why we have SAT tests and the like. Generalized tests that are the same for all students and not dependent on the teacher. Really? Those tests are made by teachers. At least, as far as I understand the Education Industry, tests are manufactured by those mostly occupied with the profession of teaching. Nothing wrong with that. Everything wrong with that.
My response there (very slightly edited to remove the silly typos):
There is a real problem with judging how effective a teacher is and I don’t think there is any good method to judge all teachers. Well, there is no easy method. If you want to judge a teacher, first test his/her students when they arrive, inform the teacher precisely what you want from him(skipping the ‘/her’ for the rest of my comment) and then test the student again after some time has passed. Also, do this to more than one teacher so you can see if one is doing better than the other. Then, make sure you understand, and use, statistics to properly decide if improvement has been made
You will soon find that making and administering a good test takes a whole lot of work. As you appear to want communication skills instead of grammar and vocab, I suggest asking students oral questions or long answer written questions. Then you will need to read every essay or listen to every single answer.
I don’t know any teacher that wants to teach TOEIC. My students are required to take a TOEIC test and that affects their grade but we have never seen the test nor know when our students take it. Administrators seem to like because it is the opposite of what I described above: it is easy to administer and easy to grade. If you make a better test of English communication that is relatively easy to administer and grade, you will make a lot of teachers very happy.
I haven’t read your posts before, Wangjangnim, and I don’t know you or your place of business. Your writing shows you have better English than most of the Hagwon owners I have known. I am not attacking you personally, but your claim that:
“General Tests are scams. Huge scams with children, an parents, as victims”
is probably true but, only in the same way, “Hagwon owners are scammers. Huge scammers with children and parents as victims.” is. Teachers teach to the test because parents and hagwon owners (and some university Deans) require them to.
I just feel you are attacking a group – teachers – that is not a free agent on the issue. If you can make a better test, I really want to see it.
Now, there are parts to his post that I like and suggest I may have been too hasty in attacking it. for example, how to do well in a job interview:
If you truly love your profession, a better strategy would be to show me your passion for teaching and to give indication to things you helped master in- and outside of the classroom.
And he includes some kernel of an idea of how to fix the problem:
We will only know who is truly a great teacher, once teachers stop evaluating themselves, and start being evaluated by the results they achieved with their students through proper assessment tools. Until then, the ESL mess we are in will remain unchanged.
Teachers are indeed somewhat at fault with poorly learning outcomes in their students. At the same time, many teachers are often given close instruction in how and what they are to teach. I am mostly grateful for that as I could really get sidetracked into teaching zombie epidemic survival skills and anti-religious rants, neither of which have much value outside of Youtube comment threads.
On the other hand, I have been told to teach TOEIC skills from a TOIEC book and many teachers here are expected to do the same. I have taught at a hagwon where the owner required me to be the parrot for movie lines. We spent months watching Avatar, repeating each line “three to five times”.
I don’t know this Wangjangnim but I would sincerely love to hear if he has a test that can accurately test student’s abilities even when teachers do not ‘teach to the test’. One valid test I can think of would be to parachute students who have finished classes into central Canada and see how quickly they get out. Ah, maybe a more urban area would be appropriate – we are testing English not wilderness survival skills. I guess we could test for student’s motivations and their strengths to see how much immersion they can handle but then we run into the Hagwon problem – the owner has two clients: the child and the parent and the latter seems to want TOIEC.
I want to be fair to Wangjangnim and I really want to hear what a fairly articulate hagwon owner really thinks. I hope that my attacks on his post are not fueled by the standard hagwon teacher/ hagwon owner tension and will be following his blog for a bit.