Here in Korea, stating something that harms-financially or otherwise- a business or group, even if it is true, is legally actionable.
The Marmot and Brian in Jeollamando have discussed the issue. I recall a case a few years back where a hagwon ESL teacher complained in print about his school. He was then sued. After a very quick search I was unable to find posts on the story at the above blogs.
In the UK, similar problems exist and were brought to light in the case of Simon Singh and the British Chiropractic Association. From the Guardian:
Singh was sued by the BCA for a piece he wrote in the Guardian‘s comment pages, criticising the association for defending chiropractors who use treatments for which there is little evidence on children with conditions such as colic and asthma.
Now Pharyngula, and doubtless other blogs and citizens in the UK, are pushing for libel reform.
This week is the first anniversary of the report Free Speech is Not for Sale, which highlighted the oppressive nature of English libel law. In short, the law is extremely hostile to writers, while being unreasonably friendly towards powerful corporations and individuals who want to silence critics.
The English libel law is particular dangerous for bloggers, who are generally not backed by publishers, and who can end up being sued in London regardless of where the blog was posted. The internet allows bloggers to reach a global audience, but it also allows the High Court in London to have a global reach.
I am uncertain of the value of signatures on a petition from out of the UK, but there is a petition here, if you’re so inclined.
I am now going to play the foreigner card and cowardly suggest that this kind of reform needs to take place here and ask if any Koreans are willing to get to work on it…I will watch and cheer you on.